whom of which

USAGE SUMMARY

'whom of which' is not a correct and usable phrase in written English.
Instead, you would use the phrase 'of which'. For example, you could say, "The author, of which I was a fan, wrote the book."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

During the observation period, 166 MCI converted to AD, 6 AD converted to MCI, and 19 NL evolved to MCI whom 3 of which subsequently evolved to AD. Intrinsically, the model considered that control subjects had CDR-SOB scores of zero which was in agreement with the observations.

CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology

The end result of a realist evaluation is a refined set of assumptions, namely, a refined PT, which provides information on what kind of interventions worked for whom, under which conditions and how.

BMJ Open

The end result of a realist evaluation is a refined set of assumptions a refined PT that provides information on what kind of interventions work for whom, in which condition and how.

BMJ Open

The bullpen, which has been dependable all year, saved the team again, along with the likes of Derek Jeter, Paul O'Neill and Bernie Williams -- each of whom homered, which is nothing new -- and David Justice, who launched his first homer as a Yankee.

The New York Times - Sports

We describe a nosocomial outbreak of infection with a novel arenavirus involving 5 patients, 4 of whom died, which occurred in South Africa in September October 2008.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

But a funeral for whom, for the dead of which wars, whose wars?

The New York Times - Arts

Without a clear basis, it was uncertain what was being claimed of whom, which left the patients' rights agenda open to co-option by other actors, most significantly the state, as seen in the production of the Department of Health Patient's charter in 1991.

Historical Journal

(The most notable exception: out-of-state employees of Boeing, whom BECU, which stands for Boeing Employees Credit Union, originally served exclusively).

The New York Times

And he argued that Mrs. Bachmann's decision was "unjustifiable" because the United States requires naturalized citizens to take an oath that contains the line: "I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen".

The New York Times

However, to become a US citizen, Mensch must state she will "absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen".

The Guardian

The oath taken by new citizens includes the words, I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "whom of which" in your writing. It's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Use "of whom" or "of which" depending on whether you are referring to people or things.

Common error

A common mistake is to combine "whom" and "of which" when one or the other is sufficient. Ensure you're using the correct relative pronoun based on whether you're referring to persons ("whom") or things ("which").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whom of which" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and doesn't serve a clear grammatical function in standard English. The individual words "whom" and "which" are relative pronouns used to introduce relative clauses, but their combination in this specific order doesn't form a valid construction. Ludwig AI confirms that it is not a correct phrase.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "whom of which" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI explains, it's not a correct and usable phrase. The individual words "whom" and "which" are relative pronouns, but their combination in this order doesn't form a valid construction. It's advisable to use either "of whom" when referring to people or "of which" when referring to things. Due to its ungrammatical nature, this phrase is inappropriate for any formal context and should be avoided to maintain clarity and credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

of whom

Specifies a subset of people from a larger group.

of which

Refers to a subset of things or ideas from a larger group.

among whom

Highlights individuals within a group.

among which

Highlights items within a set.

from whom

Indicates the source of information or action from people.

from which

Indicates the source or origin of something.

to whom

Specifies the recipient of something (usually a communication).

to which

Indicates the object or target to which something is directed.

whose

Shows possession or association with a person or thing.

whereof

Indicates 'of which' in a more formal or archaic style.

FAQs

When should I use "of whom" vs "of which"?

"Of whom" is used to refer to people, while "of which" is used to refer to things. For example, "the students, "of whom" were very studious" versus "the books, "of which" were quite old".

Is "whom of which" grammatically correct?

No, "whom of which" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's best to rephrase your sentence using either "of whom" or "of which" depending on the context.

What's a simple way to avoid using "whom of which"?

You can often rephrase the sentence to use "whose" or a possessive construction. For instance, instead of trying to use "whom of which", consider using "whose" to show possession or relationship.

Can I use "that" instead of "whom" or "which" in phrases like "of whom" or "of which"?

While "that" can sometimes replace "which" in relative clauses, it's generally not appropriate to use "that" in place of "whom" after a preposition like "of". Stick to "of whom" for people and "of which" for things.