Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Screening participation rates are rarely reported in randomized controlled trials, such that it is impossible to know to whom effect estimates generalize.
Similar(59)
The study, known as HERS, involved women who had already had heart disease, a group in whom effects should be easiest to find.
The current literature includes 11 cohorts of children for whom effects from prenatal or neonatal PCB exposures were assessed.
In contrast to the ITT, for these analyses the estimation sample is limited to those following protocol, and for whom effects are hypothesized to be larger.
Because cancer patients are a heterogeneous collective in whom effects of mistletoe treatment on immune function and safety are compromised by the underlying disease and/or conventional therapies healthy volunteers were recruited for the clinical trial.
Even if an overall ALS clinical trial was negative, it remains possible that C9ORF72 carriers could have been a responsive sub-population in whom effects were masked by non-carriers.
Similarly, unlike studies in other countries, studies in Nordic countries, with a greater size effect, usually include younger subjects, in whom the effect of IPP/VPP is less than in other subjects.
While we used age as a continuous predictor, the number of patients for whom the effect was identified based on marginal effect plots was rather low (n = 8 participants ≥ 65 years, 2.4 %).
Thus, on a relative scale, presence versus absence of AF is likely to impact mortality more in this age group than in older, multimorbid ICU patients, in whom the effect of AF is often conjugated with effects of many other conditions.
For women under the age of 50, mortality due to grade 3 cancers is unaffected by screening, in contrast with women over age 50 for whom the effect is substantial and early, relative to the effect for lower-grade cancers.
This effect was largely explained by lower educated patients, for whom the effect of consistent eye contact was stronger than for higher educated patients (β = .18, p = .01).01
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com