whole evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "whole evidence" is not commonly used in written English and may be considered incorrect.
It can be used when referring to all the evidence available in a particular context, but a more standard expression is preferred. Example: "The jury was instructed to consider the whole evidence before reaching a verdict."

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

"It is for the jury to decide on the whole evidence … whether [a secondary party] had the necessary intent".

The Guardian

Science evidence was "a very important component but often not the whole evidence base and therefore has to take its place" in the total evidence feeding into policy.

The Guardian

"It is for the jury to decide on the whole evidence," Neuberger added, "whether [a secondary party] had the necessary intent".

The Guardian

"The correct position is that … foresight of what the principal might do is evidence from which the jury may infer that he intended to assist or encourage to do so," Lord Neuberger, the president of the supreme court said, "but it is for the jury to decide on the whole evidence of whether he had the necessary intent".

The Guardian

Worse, if "strong theory" is widely used, then the whole evidence effort may turn out to make no difference, as any program on Earth can be said to have "strong theory".

Huffington Post

I'm now thinking of language as the whole evidence of these processes - how the brain thinks, how and why people communicate via the web vs. how we speak to each other in person or nonverbally.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

The whole evidence-based practice movement has been seen as devaluing the complex interpersonal element of the caring components of nursing [ 42].

BMC Health Services Research

Taken as a whole, the evidence for sustained changes to the cryosphere is clear.

The Guardian

Taken as a whole, the evidence shows a government obsessed with the beliefs and personal lives, as well as political actions, of those who might challenge its legitimacy.

The New York Times - Books

The original home of the Celts cannot be located precisely, but, on the whole, the evidence points to the eastern part of central Europe.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It plans to reform part of the tax system in isolation, when it should be thinking about the system as a whole.As evidence of this, take that lifetime limit of £50,000 on tax-free saving.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "whole evidence", ensure that you are referring to all available and relevant evidence in a particular context, not just a subset. For clarity, specify what constitutes the "whole" in your particular situation.

Common error

Avoid presenting only the evidence that supports your claim while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. Consider all the evidence when evaluating the "whole evidence" to formulate a balanced argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "whole evidence" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It refers to the entirety of the available evidence in a given context. Ludwig AI indicates it's not commonly used in written English and suggests alternative expressions.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Wiki

6.666666666666667%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3.3333333333333335%

Formal & Business

3.3333333333333335%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The term "whole evidence" refers to all available and relevant evidence in a specific context, urging comprehensive evaluation before forming judgments. While grammatically acceptable, Ludwig AI reports that it's not the most common phrase, suggesting options like "complete evidence" or "entire body of evidence". Predominantly used in news, media, and scientific domains, it carries a neutral to formal register. To ensure effective use, clarify the scope of "whole evidence" and avoid selective presentation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

complete set of evidence

Focuses on the idea of having all pieces of evidence available without specific emphasis on a single unified consideration.

entire body of evidence

Similar but emphasizes the volume and comprehensiveness of the evidence available.

total sum of evidence

Highlights the result of considering all relevant evidence.

overall evidential picture

Shifts from focusing on evidence as data to the interpretation of the entire set.

collective evidence

Focuses on the idea of multiple pieces of evidence contributing to a larger understanding.

comprehensive evidentiary base

More formal and emphasizes the foundation of evidence.

integrated evidence

Emphasizes the idea of combining various pieces of evidence into a single cohesive understanding.

holistic evidence

Suggests a comprehensive consideration of all evidence but might imply a more philosophical approach.

combined proof

Focuses more directly on the result of using various pieces of evidence for verification purposes.

accumulated evidence

Highlights the gathering process and the growing support provided by evidence.

FAQs

How is "whole evidence" used in legal contexts?

In legal settings, "whole evidence" refers to all the admissible evidence presented during a trial, which the jury must consider when making a decision. It encompasses testimonies, documents, and other forms of proof.

What does it mean to evaluate the "whole evidence" in a scientific study?

Evaluating the "whole evidence" in science involves considering all data, experimental results, and observations, even those that may seem contradictory, to draw comprehensive conclusions. It requires a rigorous assessment of the "entire body of evidence".

Is "whole evidence" the same as "complete evidence"?

While similar, "whole evidence" emphasizes the consideration of all aspects together, whereas "complete evidence" simply means that no relevant pieces are missing. The first emphasizes the synthesis, the second the collection.

Can "whole evidence" be subjective?

The interpretation of "whole evidence" can be subjective, as different individuals may weigh various pieces of evidence differently. However, the goal is to minimize subjectivity by adhering to objective standards and methodologies in evidence evaluation.