Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

who would go

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"who would go" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is a question phrase used to inquire about the potential actions of someone or a group of people. Example: "Who would go to the party with me tonight?" This sentence is asking for volunteers or interest in joining the speaker at the party.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Who would go through?

Who would go back?

News & Media

Independent

Who would go see it?

News & Media

The New York Times

The final goal would decide who would go through, and who would go out.

Who would go fearless against falling?

News & Media

The New York Times

"Who would go by in this weather?" he asked.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Surprisingly, the CD8-response isignificantlyly higher in participants who would go on to contract HIV infection.

Science

Vaccine

Early on, he made friends who would go places.

There, he met a laboratory technician named Rachel who would go on to become his wife.

The producers reportedly struggled to find financiers who would go near such miasmatic material.

News & Media

Independent

O'Callaghan, who would go on to become the governor of Nevada, helped Reid get into politics.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To add emphasis, consider preceding the phrase with an intensifier. For example, "Exactly who would go under those circumstances?"

Common error

Avoid using "will" when "would" is more appropriate to express a hypothetical or conditional scenario. For example, use "Who would go if it rained?" instead of "Who will go if it rained?" to indicate a hypothetical situation.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who would go" primarily functions as an interrogative phrase, initiating a question about potential participants or actors in a given scenario. Ludwig examples showcase its use in asking about attendance, willingness, or suitability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

34%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "who would go" functions as an interrogative phrase used to explore potential participants or actions, predominantly within hypothetical or conditional scenarios. As verified by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and versatile, fitting neutral to professional communication styles. The phrase sees common usage across diverse domains, including news, academic research, and scientific publications. To ensure effective communication, writers should be mindful of the hypothetical aspect and use the phrase in contexts where potential actions or participants are being explored rather than stating definite plans.

FAQs

How do I use "who would go" in a sentence?

The phrase "who would go" is typically used in questions to inquire about potential participants in a hypothetical or conditional situation. For example, "Who would go if the tickets were free?"

What can I say instead of "who would go"?

You can use alternatives like "who might attend", "who is likely to go", or "who is planning to go" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "who will go" instead of "who would go"?

While "who will go" is grammatically correct, it implies a definite future action, whereas "who would go" suggests a hypothetical or conditional situation. The choice depends on the intended meaning and context.

What is the difference between "who would go" and "who should go"?

"Who would go" explores potential participants in a hypothetical scenario. "Who should go" expresses an opinion or recommendation about who is the most appropriate to attend.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: