who would are

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who would are" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error, as "would" and "are" cannot be used together in this way. Example: "I wonder who would be interested in joining us."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

The only people who would are those contributing and so why then, as Gary quite rightly asks, do they bother?

The Guardian

Those who would are those who most need to hear the ecomodernist critique, but its positioning inside an "alternative framework," surrounded by off-putting language, suggests that they will not.

The New Yorker

"A lot of people will not be able to make use of [the deduction]," William Gale, an economist at the Brookings Institution and co-chair of the Tax Policy Center, told VICE, "and the people who would are probably higher income".

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Are there patients who would be inappropriate?

BMC Health Services Research

Who would be PERFECT?

The Economist

WHO would be a regulator?

The Economist

But who would be interested?

The Economist

Who would be most affected?

The New York Times

And who would be helped?

The New York Times

WHO would be a fisherman?

The Economist

Who would be more convincing?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "who would are" in formal writing. Instead, use "who would be" or other grammatically correct alternatives to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Common error

The most common error is mixing modal verbs like "would" with the present tense "are". Always ensure that modal verbs are followed by the base form of the verb, such as "be".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who would are" functions as an interrogative phrase, attempting to identify or inquire about a subject that fulfills a certain condition. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing would typically involve "be" instead of "are".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "who would are" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms that "would" should be followed by the base form of the verb, which is "be". While a few examples may be found in news media, these instances are likely errors. To maintain clarity and professionalism, it is advisable to use alternatives such as "who would be", "who might be", or "who could be", depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

who would be

Replaces "are" with the correct verb form "be" to create a grammatically sound phrase.

who might be

Substitutes "would" with "might", offering a similar meaning with a different modal verb.

who could be

Employs "could" instead of "would", suggesting possibility rather than conditionality.

who will be

Uses "will" to indicate a future state, replacing "would" for a more direct prediction.

who is going to be

Expands on "will be" with a more descriptive future tense.

who is likely to be

Adds "likely to be" to express probability, modifying the original phrase's certainty.

who is expected to be

Introduces "expected to be", indicating an anticipation or prediction from an external source.

which people would be

Adds the word "people" for clarity, emphasizing the group being considered.

which individuals would be

Replaces "people" with "individuals" for a more formal tone.

what person would be

Replaces "who" with "what person" offering similar meaning with a different word choice.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "who would are"?

The grammatically correct way to phrase this is "who would be". The modal verb "would" requires the base form of the verb.

Can I use "who would are" in a sentence?

It's best to avoid using "who would are" in formal writing because it's grammatically incorrect. Use alternatives like "who might be" or "who could be" instead.

What are some alternatives to "who would are"?

Alternatives include "who would be", "who will be", and "who is going to be", depending on the intended meaning and context.

What's the difference between "who would are" and "who would be"?

"Who would are" is grammatically incorrect. "Who would be" is the correct form, using the modal verb "would" with the base form "be" to express a hypothetical or conditional state.