Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

who was

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who was" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to refer to something that has already happened in the past, usually describing a person or thing. For example: "He was the President who was known for his generosity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Who was?

News & Media

The Economist

Who was inside, and who was outside?

News & Media

The New York Times

Who was good?" and "Who was mean?

Who was he? Who was he?

News & Media

The New York Times

Who was the sailor?

News & Media

The New York Times

So who was funnier?

News & Media

The New York Times

Who was the speaker?

News & Media

The Economist

Who was stupid?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Who was Souchock?

Who was most accurate?

News & Media

The New York Times

WHO was that monarch?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "who was" to inquire about a person's identity, role, or characteristics in the past. Ensure the context clearly indicates you're seeking information about a past state or action.

Common error

Avoid using "who was" when referring to a person's current identity or role. Use "who is" instead to ask about their present state.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who was" functions as an interrogative phrase, specifically used to ask about the identity, role, or characteristics of a person in the past. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating this function in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Science

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "who was" serves as a very common and grammatically correct interrogative phrase used to inquire about a person's identity or role in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is well-established in English. It is predominantly used in news and media contexts, maintaining a neutral register suitable for various forms of communication. When seeking to identify an individual's past role or characteristic, "who was" is a direct and effective choice.

FAQs

How to use "who was" in a sentence?

Use "who was" to ask about someone's identity or role in the past. For example, "Who was the first president of the United States?"

What can I say instead of "who was"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "who were" (for plural subjects), or "what was" (when referring to an object or event).

Which is correct, "who was" or "who is"?

The correct choice depends on the time frame you're referencing. Use "who was" for the past and "who is" for the present. For example, "Who was the director of that film?" (past) vs. "Who is the current CEO?" (present).

What's the difference between "who was" and "who had been"?

"Who was" refers to a general past identity or role, while "who had been" refers to a past identity or role at a point further in the past, often before another event. For example, "Who was the captain of the team last year?" vs. "Who had been the captain before she took over?"

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: