Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Recent Nobel choices have provided bonanzas for their British publishers - especially Harvill Secker who publish Coetzee, Grass, Kertész and Saramago.
The authors have raised this issue with both specific publishers (e.g. Elsevier, who publish Tetrahedron) and the STM Publisher's Association.
Many authors who publish with traditional print houses have also signed with e-publishers.
It has fined economists who publish their own inflation estimates.
Our results worryingly show that academics who publish with a larger proportion of female co-authors are less cited.
In addition, many researchers who publish such studies do not include or integrate data from all three domains of human, animal, and environmental health.
Second, we show that authors who publish in these journals are more likely to receive positive assessments when they are evaluated by (randomly selected) committee members who lack research expertise.
Prisoners who publish their writing are legally protected under the First Amendment.
People who publish leaked documents without winding up barricaded in London's Ecuadorian embassy.
People who publish leaked documents without winding up endorsing a president who is evil and stupid.
A useful analogy is to authors who publish under a pseudonym.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com