who has got

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "who has got" is correct and can be used in formal and informal written English.
For example: "Who has got the highest score in the game?".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Who has got this right?

The Guardian - Opinion

So who has got it right?

The Guardian - Music

It's the substitute Gedo who has got it.

The Guardian - Sport

Who has got the weakest banter at Sky? Nasser [Hussain].

The Guardian - Sport

This is a woman who has got her confidence back.

The Guardian

There is brilliance in everybody who has got some ideas.

The Guardian

This is a man who has got great judgment.

The New York Times

Now, decades later, it's Madonna who has got a rat in her kitchen.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

In the U.S., it's about who has got the fastest and best network.

The New York Times

As the secularist might see it, Santorum is the one who has got things upside-down.

The New Yorker

"It's who has got the best, who has got the newest, and it's coming not just from the grandparents, as you might expect, but from the parents themselves".

The New York Times - Style

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "who has got" when you want to sound less formal and more conversational. It's perfectly acceptable in everyday speech and informal writing.

Common error

In formal writing, consider using alternatives like "who possesses" or "who has obtained" instead of "who has got" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "who has got" functions as an interrogative clause, typically used to inquire about the possession or attainment of something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Formal & Business

29%

Science

27%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "who has got" is a grammatically sound and very common phrase used to inquire about possession or attainment. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, its register leans towards neutral to informal contexts. For more formal writing, consider alternatives like "who possesses" or "who has obtained". The phrase is frequently found in news and media, formal business, and science-related sources. Remember to tailor your language to the specific context to maintain the appropriate tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

who possesses

Replaces "has got" with a more formal synonym for "possesses".

who owns

Substitutes "has got" with "owns", emphasizing ownership.

who has obtained

Replaces "has got" with a more formal "has obtained".

who is in possession of

Uses a more elaborate phrase to indicate possession.

who has acquired

Replaces "has got" with "has acquired", focusing on the act of acquiring.

who controls

Emphasizes control rather than mere possession.

who is holding

Focuses on the act of holding something at the moment.

who carries

Suggests physically carrying something.

who is equipped with

Emphasizes being equipped or furnished with something.

who has access to

Focuses on having the ability or right to use something.

FAQs

How can I use "who has got" in a sentence?

"Who has got" is used to inquire about possession or attainment. For example, "Who has got the winning ticket?" or "Who has got the most experience in this field?".

What's a more formal alternative to "who has got"?

In formal contexts, you can use alternatives like "who possesses" or "who has obtained", which are considered more professional and refined.

Is "who has got" grammatically correct?

Yes, "who has got" is grammatically correct, although it's considered less formal than "who possesses" or "who has". It is widely used in everyday English.

When should I avoid using "who has got"?

Avoid using "who has got" in highly formal or academic writing. In such contexts, opt for more sophisticated alternatives like "who possesses" or "who has acquired".