Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The aim of this study was to test the prognostic value of both the original and the modified 2010 WHO grading systems.
Bleeding in ICU was scored according to the WHO grading system, and risk factors were evaluated using unadjusted and adjusted analyses.
Tumors were staged and graded according to the 2002 TNM classification and the 1973 WHO grading system, respectively [32] [33].
BS series are primary tumor tissues obtained from patients diagnosed with primary CNS tumors classified according to the WHO grading system.
In accordance with the WHO grading scheme, active trachoma was defined as the presence of either trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) or trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI).
Lens grading was performed using the WHO grading system [ 45].
Of these, 91 cases permitted complete assignment of WHO grading.
Toxicities encountered were classified according to the WHO grading system.
Toxicity and adverse events occurring during THAL therapy were evaluated according to the WHO grading system.
So far, we compared the data purely based on WHO grading regardless of tumor tissue origin.
This study confirms the predictive value of the WHO grading system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com