Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
who agree
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "who agree" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "who agrees" to match the subject-verb agreement in the present tense. Example: "The committee members who agree on the proposal will sign the document."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
"I have friends who agree with you.
News & Media
There are many who agree.
News & Media
But even those who agree are cautious.
News & Media
We talk only to the people who agree with us".
News & Media
RARE is the mother and daughter who agree about style.
News & Media
And there are other public figures who agree with him.
News & Media
Their parents who agree vote for an older party.
News & Media
We spend our days with people who agree with us.
News & Media
And he has many customers who agree with him.
News & Media
But what of all the voters who agree with Ryan?
News & Media
For those who agree, this event is a must.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
In formal writing, always use "who agrees" instead of "who agree" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, "The committee members who agree on the proposal..." should be "The committee members who agrees on the proposal..."
Common error
Avoid using "who agree" in formal contexts. It's a common mistake to overlook the subject-verb agreement when using relative pronouns like "who". Always ensure the verb agrees with the antecedent; in this case, use "who agrees".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "who agree" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun by providing more information about individuals sharing a particular viewpoint or consenting to specific actions. However, Ludwig AI highlights that it's grammatically incorrect; "who agrees" should be used.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
35%
Formal & Business
25%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
While the phrase "who agree" appears frequently across diverse sources, including reputable news outlets and scientific publications, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The correct form, "who agrees", should be favored in formal writing to ensure subject-verb agreement. When seeking alternatives, consider using phrases like "who are in agreement" or "who concur" to maintain both accuracy and clarity. By understanding the nuances of grammar and context, you can effectively convey your intended message while upholding the standards of formal communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
who are in agreement
This alternative is a more grammatically correct and formal way to express the same idea.
who concur
This single-word verb offers a more concise and formal alternative, suitable for professional contexts.
who are aligned
This phrase shifts the focus to alignment rather than direct agreement, implying a broader consensus.
who share the same opinion
This alternative highlights the sharing of opinions, emphasizing the similarity of viewpoints.
who hold a similar view
This phrase emphasizes the holding of a viewpoint, suggesting a more considered perspective.
who are of the same mind
This idiomatic expression suggests a complete alignment of thoughts and intentions.
who see eye to eye
This idiomatic expression signifies complete agreement and understanding.
who are in accordance
This phrase emphasizes agreement with a set of rules, principles, or standards.
who accede
This verb suggests a formal agreement, often implying acceptance of a proposal or condition.
who acquiesce
This verb suggests a passive agreement, often implying reluctant acceptance.
FAQs
What is the correct grammatical form, "who agree" or "who agrees"?
The grammatically correct form is "who agrees". The verb must agree with the antecedent. Therefore, use "who agrees" to maintain subject-verb agreement.
Is "who agree" ever acceptable in writing?
While "who agree" is frequently used, Ludwig AI points out that it is not grammatically correct in standard written English. Opt for "who agrees" or alternatives like "who are in agreement" for formal writing.
What are some alternatives to "who agree"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "who concur", "who are aligned", or "who share the same opinion". Each carries a slightly different nuance.
How can I ensure I use the correct verb form after "who"?
Always check the antecedent (the noun the "who" refers to). If the antecedent is singular, use the singular verb form ("agrees"). If it's plural, the plural form might be acceptable in specific contexts, but it's generally safer to rephrase to avoid the issue.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested