(One might contend that Boole is an exception as far as classical propositional logic is concerned).
Clifford's Rule derives its moral validity, one might contend, from that intellectual goal.
Unlike the case of color, one might contend, no pitch that is essentially a mixture of other pitches occupies a unique place in pitch space.
Third, one might contend that Kant's Refutation demonstrates that the reference in question must be (relatively) permanent, and that there is nothing in the Berkeleyan spatial realm that satisfies this requirement.
One might contend that man teams have dominated the interspecies face-offs in the Super Bowl because the N.F.L. has more of them.
Or one might contend it is irrelevant because Bell Labs (unlike today's technology companies) had the luxury of serving a parent organization that had a large and dependable income ensured by its monopoly status.
One might contend, and quite legitimately, that someone who has been murdered by another person will never have the opportunity to grow, heal, or change.
For instance, one might contend that even before the handle and head definitely come to compose something, there exists an object a "proto-hammer"—located in the region that the two of them jointly occupy.
One might contend that we therefore lack a good reason to think that, in contrast to a purely visual or tactile experience, a purely auditory experience would be an entirely non-spatial experience (see O'Callaghan 2010).
One might contend that the understanding of (closed) formulas not only as meaningful sentences but also as sequences of symbols on paper is as crucial to Schönfinkel's procedure as it is to Gödel's first incompleteness theorem.
One might contend that in a world which produced 36 billion tons of carbon emissions in 2013, the impact of a sporting event, even one the magnitude of an Olympic Games, is too small to be of concern.
