Your English writing platform
Free sign upSimilar(60)
One pair gave an answer that was adequate, although not thorough, while the last pair's response invoked introns, an informative answer, in that it revealed a misconception grounded in a basic understanding of the Central Dogma, concerning the absence of splicing in bacteria.
Nothing if not thorough!
Nevertheless, it's nothing if not thorough.
She did – Hathaway's nothing if not thorough.
The poet was nothing if not thorough.
That is efficient, but not thorough.
His review was "informative but it was not thorough".
But they weren't thorough enough.
That doesn't mean that he wasn't thorough.
That is not to say she isn't thorough.
"Obviously we weren't thorough enough," Mr. McAteer said.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com