Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
It is a possibly wide stream of heterogeneous researches, of which we list just the few we are aware of.
The manner in which we list similarities and differences, the nature of the correspondences between domains: these things are left unspecified.
In fact, many investigators have introduced different functional responses into related equations for epidemiological modeling, of which we list [12 17] and references cited therein.
The responses were measured using various indicators, which we list here: shortened culm length (CL), delayed days to heading (DTH), and great reduction ratio of spikelet number per panicle (R_SPP) and percentage of seed set (PSS).
The majority of projects were not impacted, but based on our findings, we believe that you may have project(s) that were impacted, which we list at the end of this email.
In Appendix C we show that <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000217.e005.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> We applied the maximum likelihood estimator to the experimental estimates of population fitness for ΦX174 and VSV, and using a likelihood ratio test we defined 95% confidence intervals (CI), which we list here in parentheses.
However, our work has several other novel and important conclusions, some of which we list here.
For Figure 5A and Figure 9A, in which there are many tree-map plots showing recurring CDR3 sequences, we added a supplementary table in which we list the top ten CDR3 sequences for the CDR3 tree-map plot that show recurring CDR3 sequences in each figure.
Accession numbers are for the USDA Germplasm Resource Information Network GRINN) except for Pendek38, for which we have listed the accession number for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
To illustrate the lack of uniqueness of capability of the van't Veer gene list, which we denote List A in this paper, we compare results on a different gene list, denoted List B, selected on the basis of cross-patient consistency rather than maximising classification accuracy on a specific classification model.
We started with responses we received from some of the largest companies, which we've listed in a chart.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com