which took not

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "which took not" is not correct in standard written English.
It is an archaic construction that may be found in older texts but is not commonly used in contemporary writing. Example: "The journey, which took not a moment longer than expected, was a pleasant surprise."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It is a visceral, overwhelming read, which took not only the inaugural Goldsmiths prize, set up to reward innovative fiction, but the Baileys women's prize for fiction, generally a far more mainstream award.

The Guardian - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

"I can't believe she did a cartwheel," Lily Hayes's mother laments almost halfway through Jennifer DuBois's psychologically astute second novel, which takes not only its title but its controlling metaphor from this gymnastic feat.

The New York Times - Books

Then, for increasing the difference between edges, background and noise, the fuzzy enhancement operator which takes not only the wavelet module magnitude into account, but also the wavelet gradient direction is designed.

Pattern Recognition Letters

This paper explores one of the critical issues, service deployment, for reducing execution time of composite SaaS applications, and proposes an integrated approach to the service deployment problem which takes not only inter-service communication costs but also the potential parallelism among services into consideration.

Journal of Systems and Software

Whitman had been appalled by the slave auctions which took place not far from his lodgings.

The Guardian - Books

In "Namaz," he describes accompanying a Muslim friend to a prayer service, which took place not in a mosque but at a staid midtown hotel called the Americana.

The New Yorker

He survived both attempts, which took place not long after he awarded Kosovo's second cellphone license to the Slovenian-owned IPKO.

The New York Times

Establishing himself at Worms in 1791, he set about raising the émigré "army of Condé," which took part, not very effectively, in the antirevolutionary campaigns of 1792 96.

Encyclopedia Britannica

From 1956 to 2002, Walter managed a remarkably successful investment partnership, from which he took not a dime unless his investors made money.

The New York Times

In Mr. Wright's hyper-stylized film, which takes place not on location but on a stage, movement is constant.

The New York Times - Arts

This isn't Willie Horton, which took you to crime.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "which took not" with modern alternatives like "which did not take" or "that took no" for clearer and more accessible writing.

Common error

Don't use archaic phrasing like "which took not" in contemporary writing. It can make your text sound unnatural and less professional.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which took not" functions as a relative clause, attempting to provide additional information about a noun. However, it uses an archaic structure that is not standard in modern English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "which took not" is an archaic construction and is not considered grammatically correct in modern English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, advising against its use in contemporary writing. While some sources may contain this phrasing, it is advisable to replace it with alternatives like "which did not take" or "that took no" for improved clarity and style. This ensures your writing remains accessible and professional.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

which did not take

Replaces the archaic structure with a standard negation.

that did not take

Substitutes "which" with "that" and uses a standard negation.

that didn't take

A contraction of "did not take", making it more conversational.

that took no

Replaces "which" with "that" and "not" with "no" to form a more common expression.

which took no

Replaces "not" with "no" resulting in a more common and fluent expression.

that did not involve

Alters the verb to "involve" while maintaining a similar relational meaning.

which doesn't take

Shifts to present tense with a negative contraction.

which fails to take

Emphasizes a failure to incorporate something.

that neglects to take

Highlights an omission or oversight.

which omits taking

Focuses on the act of leaving something out.

FAQs

What's a modern alternative to "which took not"?

More common alternatives include "which did not take" or "that took no".

Is "which took not" grammatically correct in English?

While it might have been acceptable in older forms of English, "which took not" is now considered grammatically incorrect. Use more modern phrasing instead.

How can I use "which did not take" in a sentence?

Example: "The study, which did not take into account all variables, produced questionable results."

What's the difference between "which took not" and "which did not take"?

"Which took not" is an archaic form, while "which did not take" is the standard modern English equivalent. The latter is much more commonly used and understood.