Sentence examples for which they reviewed from inspiring English sources

In a study, which they reviewed, of 123 subjects with no psychiatric history who were given the test, most at a California blood bank, 16percentt scored in the abnormal range on the test's schizophrenia index -- far higher than the 1percentt incidence of the illness in the general population indicated in other surveys.

He collaborated with Xian-Su Hu and published five volumes of Icones Plantarum Sincarum from 1925 to 1932, in which they reviewed all the published illustrations and descriptions of Chinese plants.

In an effort to increase resident and medical student (hereafter "trainee") reporting of adverse events, trainees developed and led a monthly conference during which they reviewed adverse event reports (AERs), identified system vulnerabilities, and designed solutions to those vulnerabilities.

Four graduate students completed an assignment designed to be authentic to typical course work, in which they reviewed a set of posts made by other students and developed at least one new post that would contribute to the group's understanding of the course material.

Before going ahead with the ceremony, Aliferis had a long meeting with the municipality's legal adviser at which they reviewed the legality and legitimacy of these marriages.

"We thank the Department of Justice for the care with which they reviewed the case," said attorney William Burck in a statement.

The new cyber-mercantalists like China and Russia live in a system in which they review international trade as power competition, with cyberattacks and all the rest.

In addition to the two physical counts, deputies are supposed to conduct three "administrative counts" in which they review records to determine the location of inmates.

Percentile ranking solves such predicaments, because it allows a council to identify outstanding applications, regardless of the study section under which they were reviewed.

Reviewers were not chosen to evaluate certain projects or even fields, but were allowed to choose which projects they reviewed.

All participants (n = 61) read both a paper version and the video-assisted iPad version of the same mock consent and were randomized to which format they reviewed first.