Sentence examples for which require evidence from inspiring English sources

Thistlethwaite explored the reasons, merits and nature of portfolios in medical education, emphasizing the difference between logbooks (which is a list of required activities or skills to be ticked off) and portfolios (which require evidence that learning has taken place) [ 19].

He added that the officers might have been negligent and reckless, but that those offenses are not covered by federal civil rights laws, which require evidence of intent.

(i) Compared to RANS, which require evidence for their predictions, the LUM has the significant advantage that the quality of predictions is relatively independent of the RANS model applied.

The clinician then specified whether the participant met clinical criteria for dementia and probable AD recommended by the joint working group of the National Institute of Neurologic and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association, which require evidence of cognitive decline in memory and at least one other domain of cognitive function [ 12].

In the insurance world, he explained, there are three types of stealing: burglary, which requires evidence of forced entry; theft, which requires only that something have gone missing; and robbery, which is the same as theft but with a victim present — that is, you were home during the crime.

When the original Fisa law was enacted in 1978, its primary purpose was to ensure that the US government would be barred from ever monitoring the electronic communications of Americans without first obtaining an individualized warrant from the Fisa court, which required evidence showing "probable cause" that the person to be surveilled was an agent of a foreign power or terrorist organization.

Some experts think North Korea does not meet the criteria for the designation, which requires evidence that a state has "repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism".

Consistent with the Canadian guidelines, we do not recommend use of the UW diagnostic category of neurobehavioural disorder-alcohol exposed at this time, which requires evidence of moderate as opposed to severe CNS dysfunction.

It is a lifelong disability which requires evidence-based multi-professional interventions, adapted to the needs of the individual [ 3, 4].

4) In multiple places, the authors make very strong statements, which require additional evidence to support them or otherwise need to be reworded.

The evidence-based, validated decision aid is considered the highest standard of adjunct, but these are rarely available in surgical settings (which require comparative evidence from randomised studies), and no such material has been developed for oesophageal cancer treatments.