which produced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "which produced" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something previously mentioned that has caused an effect. For example: "The increased demand for cars has led to a rise in emissions, which produced an alarming level of pollution in the city."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

ABC Sports, which produced the sketch, apologized.

The New York Times

The initial price was $102,000, which produced no nibbles.

The New York Times

The gene was put into bacteria, which produced the insulin.

The New York Times

Tom attended Choate, which produced two shows a year.

The New York Times

I proffered increasingly preposterous proofs, which produced similar results.

The Guardian - Opinion

That union, which produced two sons, lasted six years.

The New Yorker

The marriage, which produced a son, ended in divorce.

The New York Times

His first marriage, which produced two daughters, was breaking up.

The New York Times - Arts

HIT Entertainment, which produced the show, apologised "unreservedly" to viewers.

The Guardian

The marriage, which produced a daughter, Athena, also failed.

The New York Times - Arts

The steam then drives a turbine which produced electricity.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "which produced" to clearly link a preceding event or action to its direct result. This helps maintain a smooth flow and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "that produced" when "which produced" is appropriate. "Which" introduces non-restrictive clauses, adding extra information. If the clause is essential to the sentence's meaning, "that" might be suitable, but for additional details, "which produced" is preferred. For example, "The experiment, which produced unexpected results, will be repeated."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "which produced" functions as a non-restrictive relative clause, adding extra information about the result or outcome of a preceding noun or clause. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples where it elaborates on a previous action or event.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

16%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Science

9%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "which produced" functions as a non-restrictive relative clause, adding supplementary information regarding the outcome of a previous action or event. This phrase is commonly used in news, academic writing, and encyclopedic entries. Ludwig AI validates its widespread application, showcasing its effectiveness in providing additional context and elaborating on consequences. When writing, remember to use "which produced" when you want to offer extra detail about a result. Be mindful of the non-restrictive nature of the clause introduced by "which", and ensure that the information is supplementary rather than essential to the core meaning of the sentence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

resulting in

Focuses on the outcome or consequence, similar to "which produced" but emphasizes the result.

that generated

Highlights the act of creation or origination, comparable to "which produced" but with a stronger emphasis on generation.

leading to

Emphasizes the progression or sequence of events, suggesting a causal link like "which produced".

that created

Stresses the act of bringing something into existence, similar to "which produced" but with a stronger creative connotation.

giving rise to

Indicates the start or emergence of something, akin to "which produced" but with an emphasis on the origin.

that yielded

Highlights the output or return from a process, like "which produced" but focuses on the yield.

thereby causing

Directly indicates a causal relationship, similar to "which produced" but more explicitly stating the cause.

that brought about

Emphasizes the action of causing something to happen, similar to "which produced" but more active in tone.

that fostered

Implies nurturing or supporting the development of something, related to "which produced" but emphasizes growth.

that triggered

Highlights the initiation of a process or event, similar to "which produced" but with a focus on the trigger.

FAQs

How can I use "which produced" in a sentence?

Use "which produced" to add extra, non-essential information about the result of a previous action or event. For example, "The heavy rain, which produced severe flooding, caused significant damage to the town."

What are some alternatives to "which produced"?

You can use alternatives like "resulting in", "that generated", or "leading to" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "that produced" instead of "which produced"?

While "that produced" can be grammatically correct in restrictive clauses, "which produced" is generally preferred for non-restrictive clauses, where the information is additional and not essential to the sentence's core meaning. Using "which" ensures clarity and avoids ambiguity.

What's the difference between "which produced" and "resulting in"?

"Which produced" connects an event to its outcome, while "resulting in" emphasizes the final consequence or effect. The choice depends on whether you want to focus on the action of producing or the end result.