Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig. Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
Everybody has an opinion on which one is better, but the reality is that you're getting a very similar product.
But, in the context of receiving medical treatment it seems initially bizarre that decisions will be made based on the flip of a coin given that there is an alternative and ostensibly better approach: assign treatments based on clinical judgment regarding which one is better for the individual in question.
"Why are you and your sister dressed differently today?" or "Which one is better than the other?" are things either one of you or both may hear.
Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message.
In AAF any silvicultural system was allowed in every stand, depending on which one was better in terms of the objective function.
Which one was better, and more important, which one most authentically American?
Several years ago AOL subscribers were given two sets of search results–one from AOL, the other said to be from Google and were asked to rate which one was better.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com