Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(15)
These implications make sense if intention is a species of desire that interacts with means-end belief when one does A with the intention of doing B. They are more difficult to explain if intention-with-which is the basic material from which intention and intentional action are built.
The result is a collage in which intention doesn't necessarily follow thought, and thought abstracts feeling.
Of course an individual's nature determines to some extent what happens, there will be an interplay of causes, probably too complex to disentangle, in which intention usually plays a part; but moments at which a person just says, "I shall now do X" and does it are rare – or so it has been in my life, anyway.
Or in a 'disjunctive' theory according to which intention in action has two irreducible forms: doing A intentionally and 'mere' intending, frustrated by the world?
Fourth, (§3.4) one might think, given the ways in which intention is thought to involve belief, that in being instrumentally incoherent, one violates a requirement of theoretical rationality.
Some articles which intention mainly was to develop knowledge in relation to socio-psychological aspects rather than energy consulting were also kept out of the study.
Similar(45)
Which intentions?
It's a story in which intentions are nothing and deeds are everything, in which — for all the near-constant, lively, amiable, and witty chatter — almost nothing is said.
Otherwise we would have evolved a system of communication like the one employed by dogs, in which intentions and meaning are always clear to anyone who wants to pay attention.
Intentions about which intentions count, mentioned above (discussed in Dworkin 1985 and 1986) are such factors and canons or conventions of interpretation and procedural provisions are familiar further examples.
For one, it is a will-based ethics in which intentions count for everything and external behavior or actions count for nothing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com