Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
which accommodated for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "which accommodated for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "which accommodated" or "which accounted for." Example: "The new policy was designed to address various needs, which accommodated the diverse requirements of the employees."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Thus, the cost model we used, which accommodated for skewness, was considered to be the most appropriate for examining the relationship between the insurance type and hospitalization costs.
Science
High response rate and recruitment in a wide variety of community settings, using face-to-face interviews, which accommodated for participants with low literacy and allowed for participants' responses to open-ended questions.
Science
51 Strengths of the study were the novel approach to researching smoking in this population, the high response rate and recruitment in a wide variety of community settings, using face-to-face interviews, which accommodated for participants with low literacy and allowed for capturing the participants' responses to open-ended questions.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
For instance, protein pocket-organic compound complexes are formed mainly by the means of covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, and van der Waals contacts, which accommodate for 99.9% of the interactions.
Science
The kitchen island, which accommodates stools for dining, is adorned with mosaic tiles.
News & Media
In Fig. 3, we exemplify the connection message, which accommodates meaningful information for handover execution, such as SINR, PER, and DPoA.
A more complicated option is to design a single system for all linkage projects but which accommodates differing linkage scenarios for each specific project.
A variational framework is adopted which accommodates two different spaces for representing and approximating the velocity fields calculated respectively in the viscous and inviscid phases of the method, but which leads to a very simple numerical scheme in terms of only one discrete velocity field.
DESeq allows the accurate comparisons between extreme cow groups by normalizing the number of reads, which accommodates a scaling factor for a given cow by computing the median of the ratio, for each gene, of its read count over its geometric mean across all cows [ 30].
Science
Vertigo, which accommodates 12 guests and charters for $200,000 a week, cruised the waters off Vietnam, Malaysia, Myanmar and Thailand and is now in the Maldives before it heads to the Mediterranean playgrounds in May for the summer season.
News & Media
In [11], Bhattad and Narayanan generalized the model in [9] and gave a new information theoretic model for security which accommodates a lot more practical requirements on security.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer the grammatically correct and widely accepted phrase "which accommodated" instead of "which accommodated for".
Common error
Be mindful of unnecessary prepositions. The verb "accommodate" often doesn't require "for" after it. Using "which accommodated" is usually more concise and grammatically sound.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "which accommodated for" functions as a relative clause, aiming to provide additional information about a noun. However, Ludwig AI notes that it is grammatically incorrect and the preposition "for" is usually unnecessary after the verb "accommodate".
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "which accommodated for" appears in some contexts, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, suggesting that the preposition "for" is usually redundant. The preferred and more widely accepted alternative is simply "which accommodated". When aiming for clarity and grammatical precision, especially in formal or professional writing, it's best to omit the "for". Consider also using alternative phrases like "which allowed for" or "which provided for" for nuanced meanings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
which accommodated
Omits the unnecessary preposition "for", resulting in a grammatically correct phrase.
that made provision for
Emphasizes the act of preparing or arranging something in advance to cater to specific needs.
that took into account
Highlights the careful consideration given to specific factors or circumstances.
that allowed for
Indicates the creation of space or opportunity for something to happen or be included.
which provided for
Focuses on supplying or making something available to meet a particular need.
which catered to
Implies specifically adapting to meet particular needs or preferences.
which considered
Highlights the act of thinking carefully about something, typically before making a decision.
that was adapted for
Suggests modifying something to suit a new purpose or condition.
which was designed for
Emphasizes the intention of creating something with a specific purpose or user in mind.
that facilitated
Focuses on making an action or process easier or more likely to happen.
FAQs
What's the correct way to use "accommodate" in a relative clause?
The correct phrase is "which accommodated". The inclusion of "for" after "accommodated" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.
Is "which accommodated for" ever correct?
While occasionally used, especially in certain dialects, "which accommodated for" is generally considered incorrect in standard English. The simpler form, "which accommodated", is preferred.
What can I say instead of "which accommodated for"?
Use alternatives like "which accommodated", "which allowed for", or "which provided for" depending on the context.
What's the difference between "which accommodated" and "which allowed for"?
"Which accommodated" implies making room or adjusting to something, while "which allowed for" suggests permitting or making something possible. The choice depends on the intended meaning.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested