Sentence examples for whereas comparisons from inspiring English sources

Comparisons of the phylogenies of figs with both of these types of wasps show some degree of cospeciation between figs and their pollinators (e.g., Lopez-Vaamonde et al. 2001; Jackson 2004; Jousselin et al. 2008) whereas comparisons of figs and the parasitic wasps did not show cospeciation (Weiblen and Bush 2002, but see Jousselin et al. 2008).

Expression levels of selected genes, according to categorical differences of both disease and pregnancy status were compared using the unpaired t-test, whereas comparisons of transcript levels at different time points were performed using the paired t-test.

Differences between Ad5 neutralizing antibody test groups (seronegative vs. seropositive) were tested using Wilcoxon rank tests, whereas comparisons of stimulations within the same individual were tested by Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Statistical analyses between 2 groups were performed by using a two-tailed student's t test, whereas comparisons involving multiple groups were performed with a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's or Dunnett's post test for multiple comparisons.

The large number of points around 0.36 ud/s represent pairwise comparisons between potyvirus species, whereas comparisons between the cCPs of species of different potyvirid genera ranged from 0.5 0.7 ud/s.

Comparisons between the groups were performed using independent t tests, whereas comparisons within groups were performed using paired t tests.

Whereas comparison of data derived from MRM analyses of samples from low versus high initial glycerol concentrations resulted in data that were more spread-out across the overall data set (see Additional file 2).

Finally, whereas comparison subjects showed significant activation in dorsal anterior cingulate, SEALs showed relative deactivation in this area, F 1,32) = 11.21, p = 0.002.

Whereas comparison of species richness estimates between different regions of 16S rRNA was out of the scope of this work, our findings are in accord with a recent report [24], showing that the V1-V2 regioverestimatedted species richness unlike the V3 region, which underestimated the richness.

Intervention areas received the iCCM program detailed above, whereas comparison areas continued with the pre-existing routine CCM program.

Reproducibility of the FF and FFPE replicates was measured using Pearson correlation, whereas comparison between the FF and FFPE samples was done using a Z-score analysis.