In the Additional file 1, we give an explicit example from one of the datasets used ("Smut Fungi & Caryophillaceus plants" [ 27] with cost vector 〈0,1,1,1〉) where indeed EUCALYPT finds more (correct) solutions, some of which are acyclic, that are time-feasible.
The typical sex difference (Frederick, 2005; Campitelli & Gerrans, 2014; Pennycook et al., 2016) was observed for CRT scores, where male participants gave significantly more correct answers (M = 0.88) than female participants (M = 0.41), t(496) = 4.59, p <.001, d =.513, and fewer intuitive answers (M = 1.83) than female participants (M = 2.32), t(496) = 4.29, p <.001, d =.494.
This classification had long been recognized to be artificial, and in 1985, Ehlers proposed a phylogenetically more correct classification, where the massively polyphyletic "Turbellaria" was split into a dozen orders, and Trematoda, Monogenea and Cestoda were joined in the new order Neodermata.
Outcomes will be corrected for multiple testing where more than the planned number of hypotheses are tested and where more than the planned four families of hypotheses are tested.
By contrast, arguments of equality bite where the court in the original case was confronted with a situation where the correct outcome was indeterminate, i.e., where more than one outcome was possible in light of the legally permissible arguments.
A more correct term for these classes of object (that is, a network where the type of component is specified but not the absolute value) is prototype network.
A. Neither is more correct.
She couldn't have been more correct.
Never has vox populi been more correct.
He seems more correct than ever.
