Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
He displays characteristic learning and verve when he argues that America is turning into a theocracy.
David Willetts is right when he argues that a return to grammar schools won't solve anything.
Bolton is persuasive when he argues that other nations take this instrumental view of international organizations.
Shapiro is at his most persuasive when he argues against lumping Islamic radical threats together.
But when he argues that data also show that money doesn't matter in electoral politics, he slips off track.
Mr Cameron has a good case to make, especially when he argues for extending the single market to promote growth.
So perhaps Vanney is right when he argues that Saturday's head-to-head is not yet a must-win game.
A great many people here believe that Mr. Nixon reaches the peak of foolishness when he argues that American prestige is at an all-time high.
But Mr. Schrad misfires when he argues that the "symbolic" gesture of a boycott is bound to backfire in Russia's conservative antigay culture.
But this claim isn't entirely persuasive, as becomes clear when he argues that manners be made more positive, more proactive — that we should engage in "lovely gestures".
That certainly is true, and Sammy could be right when he argues that "once we eliminate those bad sessions, then we'll make progress".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com