Sentence examples for when comparing the two groups from inspiring English sources

Comparable results were obtained when comparing the two groups in terms of the percentage of nurses having sufficient knowledge (i.e. judging ≥ 70.0% of the measures in each category correctly; p = 0.15 for the useful measures category and p = 0.54 for the non-useful measures category).

When comparing the two groups, several significant differences were found.

When comparing the two groups, the subjects treated with the ESIN technique had higher range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension and pronation.

When comparing the two groups, the subjects treated with the ESIN technique had higher ROM in flexion, extension and pronation (Table 4).

All categorical variables were analysed using the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, while the independent-samples Students t/Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables when comparing the two groups in univariate analysis.

When comparing the two groups, no statistically significant differences were found (p > 0.05) for any of the parameters, and the mandibular divergence parameter was found to be of borderline significance.

When comparing the three groups, a one-way ANOVA test was conducted to determine differences between the groups.

Regarding the mandibular components, none of the evaluated variables presented statistically significant differences when comparing the three groups (Table 7).

When comparing the three groups, a one-way ANOVA test was conducted to determine differences among the 3 years.

There were no statistically significant differences in width measurements in the maxilla when comparing the three groups, neither in the coronal nor in the apical width measurements (Table 2).

No significant difference was found in width measurements in the maxilla when comparing the three groups, neither in the coronal nor in the apical width measurements in the present study.