Suggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Wheat grain samples have PXD residues in the range of 1.58 4.51 μg/g, and the cardinal distribution shows that the wheat samples collected from western spots of the pilot field have high concentration of PXD.
To demonstrate the usefulness of the assay, 100 wheat samples collected from all over the German state of Bavaria were analyzed for the trichothecene mycotoxin DON by HPLC and for the presence of trichothecene producers by the new real-time duplex LAMP assay in parallel analyses.
Wheat samples collected from northern, central, northwestern and southwestern areas tested positive by PCR for WDV, suggesting that WDV was widely distributed throughout China.
Similar(57)
Soil, water, and wheat grain samples, collected from the nearby places of the pilot field, were carried and subjected to the optimized acetate buffered QuEChERS procedure in order to confirm the presence or absence of PXD.
Wheat samples were collected from 10 areas of 6 cities and counties from northern Taiwan to southern Taiwan.
The soil, water, and wheat samples were collected from surface and form a pre-defined depth of 6 and 12 in.
A total of 52 wheat samples were collected from the harvest of two consecutive years (2010, 2011) from two counties (Timis and Arad) located in Western Romania and the presence of ochratoxin A (OTA), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZON) and fumonisins (FUMO) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
All the wheat samples were collected from Hubei experimental fields in the growing season of 2010.
A bacterial culture capable of degrading DON was obtained from soil samples collected in wheat fields using an enrichment culture procedure.
Examples of the microstructure of wheat particles recovered from the terminal ileum after ingestion of the coarse porridge are shown in Figure 5. Intact particles of durum wheat of ∼2 mm diameter were evident in all samples collected throughout the day but not in the overnight samples.
CG completed wheat sample collection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com