what we learned

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "what we learned" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was learned in a particular situation. For example, "In our history class, we discussed the rise of fascism in Europe, and what we learned was that it was a complex process that led to many negative consequences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

What we learned?

The Guardian

Here's what we learned.

The Guardian

That's what we learned".

The New Yorker

What we learned from the Beat poets.

The New Yorker

That's what we learned first, too".

The New York Times - Sports

This is what we learned.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Guess what we learned?

TechCrunch

— and disseminate what we learn.

The New Yorker

That's what we learn from experience".

The New Yorker

This is what we learnt: 1.

Independent

Let's see what we learn.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "what we learned" to clearly and concisely summarize key takeaways from a project, study, or experience. This phrase is effective in reports, presentations, and discussions where conveying acquired knowledge is important.

Common error

Avoid using "what we learned" without providing specific details. Ensure you follow the phrase with concrete examples, insights, or conclusions to make your communication meaningful. For example, instead of saying "What we learned was important", state "What we learned was that collaboration improves efficiency by 20%."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "what we learned" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence or clause. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used when referring to something that was learned in a particular situation. The examples in Ludwig clearly demonstrate its use in introducing summaries of insights or key takeaways.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Science

16%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "what we learned" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to introduce insights and conclusions derived from experiences or studies. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in written English. With a neutral register, it fits seamlessly into various contexts, from news articles to academic reports. The most frequent contexts where we can find this phrase are in "News & Media", "Science" and "Formal & Business". To maximize clarity, follow "what we learned" with specific details rather than vague statements. By using this phrase thoughtfully, you can effectively communicate the knowledge gained from your experiences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the lessons we took away

Emphasizes the actionable insights gained.

our key findings

Focuses on the most important discoveries.

the insights gained

Highlights the new understanding achieved.

knowledge acquired

Stresses the gaining of knowledge.

the understanding developed

Highlights the growth of comprehension.

the conclusions drawn

Focuses on the resulting judgments.

the information gathered

Emphasizes the collection of data.

the facts established

Highlights confirmed truths.

the points noted

Stresses specific observations.

our acquired wisdom

Conveys the sense of valuable insight gained over time.

FAQs

How can I use "what we learned" in a sentence?

You can use "what we learned" to introduce a summary of insights gained from an experience. For instance, "What we learned during the experiment was that temperature significantly affects reaction time."

What's a more formal way to say "what we learned"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "the key findings", "the insights gained", or "the conclusions drawn". These alternatives provide a more professional tone while conveying the same meaning.

Is it correct to say "what we have learned" instead of "what we learned"?

Both "what we learned" and "what we have learned" are grammatically correct. "What we learned" is simple past tense, referring to a completed learning experience. "What we have learned" is present perfect tense, emphasizing the relevance of the learning to the present.

What are some alternatives to "what we learned" that highlight specific aspects of the learning process?

Alternatives like "the lessons we took away", "knowledge acquired", or "the understanding developed" emphasize different aspects of the learning experience. Each phrase offers a slightly different nuance, allowing you to tailor your language to the specific context. Use "the lessons we took away" when focusing on practical applications.