Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

what was learned

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "what was learned" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when summarizing or reflecting on knowledge or insights gained from an experience, study, or discussion. Example: "At the end of the workshop, we discussed what was learned and how we could apply it in our future projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

What was learned?

News & Media

The New York Times

What was learned from the DNC hack?

So what was learned at The Oval?

What was learned in lessons was made evident in worship.

Look at what was learned from that hacking".

News & Media

The New Yorker

What was learned from the investigation is more relevant than ever today.

News & Media

The New York Times

It will also automatically generate a punchy civilian translation of what was learned there.

News & Media

The New York Times

Its report summarizing what was learned from these trials is posted on the SRI home page.

But look at the things that were hacked, look at what was learned from that hacking.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

So what is learned?

Cultural symbols transmit what is learned to new generations.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing a report or summary, use "what was learned" to clearly state the knowledge or skills gained from a specific experience or study. For instance, begin a section with: "What was learned from this experiment is…" to highlight key findings.

Common error

Avoid making broad claims about "what was learned" without providing specific details or evidence to support your statements. Ensure your conclusions are directly linked to the data or experiences you are referencing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "what was learned" functions as a noun clause, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to the information, skills, or insights acquired through experience, study, or instruction. This is supported by Ludwig's examples where the phrase introduces or summarizes findings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Academia

28%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "what was learned" is a versatile noun clause commonly used to encapsulate knowledge gained from various experiences. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's grammatically sound and frequently appears in news, scientific, and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to provide specific supporting details and avoid overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "lessons learned" or "key takeaways" can offer stylistic variations, but "what was learned" remains a clear and effective choice for conveying acquired knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "what was learned" in a sentence?

You can use "what was learned" to introduce a summary of key insights. For example: "What was learned from the study indicates a strong correlation between exercise and mental health."

What are some alternatives to using "what was learned"?

Alternatives include "lessons learned", "key takeaways", or "insights gained". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "what was learned" or "the things that were learned"?

"What was learned" is more concise and often preferred in formal writing. "The things that were learned" can be used for emphasis or in more informal contexts.

How does "what was learned" differ from "what was taught"?

"What was learned" refers to the knowledge or skills acquired by an individual, while "what was taught" refers to the information or instruction provided by an educator or trainer. They represent different sides of the learning process.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: