Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
It is hard to imagine how new his blurred brushstrokes and his use of what Observer critic Laura Cumming calls "burning black" once were.
Here's what what Observer film critic Philip French thought: This film is a memorial to a peculiarly elitist culinary aesthetic where everything is new, original, cutting edge, following the master of "molecular gastronomy" on one of his last big years.
It will offer what Observer editor John Mulholland called "a creative jolt to the system, forcing us to broaden our horizons in search of different, challenging stories, often told by a new group of storytellers".
Or is it still an example of what Observer writer John Naughton recently called "digital capitalism", suggesting that "the billionaire geeks who currently run the giant internet companies may look and talk like a new species of entrepreneur but it would be more prudent to view them as John D Rockefellers in hoodies"?
Similar(56)
What, observers thought, was going on?
Argentina experienced what observers called a transformative election.
See articleAt least someone's happyUkraine held what observers described as a deeply flawed election.
Mr Viraphonh claims that what observers witnessed was only "preparatory work".
The testimony of what observers saw and what they believed is a key tool in our understanding of the past.
And like many indicators of the nation's economic health, what observers are seeing is cause for serious concern.
It confirmed what observers have whispered for years: that the friendship between Mr. Espaillat and Mr. Martinez is in tatters.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com