Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
what do you join
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "what do you join" is not correct in standard written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in a context where someone is asking about a specific group, organization, or activity that another person is becoming a part of, but it lacks clarity. Example: "In this meeting, I want to know what do you join when you become a member of the club."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
— What? — Do you join?
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
What do you think, should we join?
News & Media
So obviously I have to ask, what do you think about Michael Che joining "Weekend Update?" Colin Quinn: I think it's a mistake.
News & Media
What do you think: will you be joining in next year?
News & Media
"One of the most frustrating things I encounter is on the weekends when I go to a cocktail party and people say, 'What do you do?' " says Dennis Mooradian, who joined Wells in 1996 from Lehman Brothers to run the bank's private client businesses.
News & Media
What do you look for in people to join you on that team that can survive at a dynamic company?
News & Media
If you don't have any intention of joining in, what do you say?
News & Media
That's all I want to say There have been reports in the UK that you've joined Isis, what do you make of that?
News & Media
(The fee only applies to members who have signed up since April 2011; no decision has been made, the company said, about whether to offer the new structure to members who had joined previously. ) What do you think of such a fee?
News & Media
Bradley Shields, fifty-six years old, joined in Honolulu What do you do outside of Occupy Wall Street?
News & Media
And feel free to join the "Lulu" chorus — what do you think of Loutallica and the record it wrought?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Specify the type of entity (e.g., organization, group, team) for clearer communication: "What kind of organization are you joining?"
Common error
Do not use the phrase "what do you join". It's grammatically incorrect. Instead, ask "what are you joining?" or "what will you join?"
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "what do you join" functions as an interrogative phrase used to inquire about someone's affiliations. However, it is grammatically incorrect. As indicated by Ludwig, it would be better to use the present continuous or future tense form of the verb "join".
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Wiki
25%
Science
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
15%
Encyclopedias
5%
Social Media
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "what do you join" is grammatically incorrect and rarely used. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this assessment. It's better to use grammatically correct alternatives like "what are you joining?" or "what will you join?" for clarity. While the phrase appears in various contexts, including News & Media and Wiki sources, its flawed structure makes it unsuitable for formal communication. Therefore, avoid using this phrase in writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
What are you joining?
Corrects the grammatical structure to use the present continuous tense, focusing on an action happening now or in the near future.
What will you join?
Shifts the focus to a future action, asking about planned affiliations or memberships.
What do you plan to join?
Adds intention and planning to the question, emphasizing future actions.
What kind of organization are you joining?
Specifies the type of entity being joined, adding context and clarity.
Which group are you going to join?
Uses "group" instead of organization, focusing on a specific collective.
What society will you become a member of?
Rephrases to focus on becoming a member, emphasizing formal association.
What are you becoming a part of?
Focuses on the act of becoming involved in something.
What team are you trying out for?
Specifies a tryout process, focusing on competitive selection.
What league do you intend to participate in?
Formalizes the context, referring to participation in a structured league.
Which association are you affiliating with?
Uses "affiliating" for a formal connection, implying a professional or organizational link.
FAQs
How to correctly ask about someone's future affiliations?
Instead of using the ungrammatical phrase "what do you join", ask "what are you joining?" to inquire about current or near-future affiliations, or "what will you join?" for future plans.
What are some alternatives to "what do you join" that are grammatically correct?
Correct alternatives include "what are you joining?", "what will you join?", and "what kind of organization are you joining?" depending on the context.
Which is the correct phrasing, "what do you join" or "what are you joining"?
"what are you joining?" is the correct phrasing. "What do you join" is not grammatically sound in standard English.
How can I specify the type of group or organization I'm asking about?
Use a more specific question like "what team are you joining?" or "what club are you joining?" to clarify the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested