Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
These seemingly unrelated "facts" invite us to ask what connects them, and just what a "fact" is anyway.
This superfluity makes for an odd reading of the text; and the oddness is highlighted by the observation that this first formulation of the sceptical problem relies on Kripke's assumption that we have some idea of what a fact is, independent of a statement's being true.
Jimmy Kimmel takes Sean Spicer to town over what a fact is.
Tillerson said it's the responsibility of all Americans to recognize "what truth is and is not," and "what a fact is and is not".
Similar(56)
But he discovers that in the midst of war it's not clear what is a fact and what is not a fact.
What a weird fact to know, I say.
"What a comforting fact that is to know".
But just what a Bradleyan fact amounts to is by no means clear.
I think Ken Ham would concur that the evolution creationism debate is not essentially a disagreement over the facts (though it is that, too), or even the interpretation of the facts, as much as it is a disagreement about what makes a fact a fact, and most importantly, what kind of a world facts and theories belong to.
A disagreement over what facts mean is different from a dispute over what constitutes a fact in the first place.
"What's a fact?
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com