Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were watched by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were watched by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that someone or something was observed by another party in the past. Example: "The wildlife documentary revealed how the animals were watched by researchers for several months."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Jurors' rooms were watched by guards.
News & Media
We were watched by 4.4m.
News & Media
They were watched by surprisingly large and enthusiastic crowds.
News & Media
Coldplay were watched by a better known rapper, however.
News & Media
In 2010, the debates were watched by 22 million people.
News & Media
The television series made from his dozen Poldark historical novels were watched by 15 million people.
News & Media
The first videos appeared in 2010, and were watched by only a few hundred people.
News & Media
Whitehall sources do not deny that Libyan refugees and dissidents in Britain were watched by MI5.
News & Media
We slept on the bare floor and were watched by cameras.
News & Media
The finals last year were watched by an audience of more than 7,000.
News & Media
All of them were watched by a vibrant cultural divide of a spectators' gallery.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were watched by", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what is doing the watching to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, "The experiment was watched by a team of scientists" is clearer than "The experiment was watched by someone."
Common error
A common mistake is using "were watched by" without a clear indication of who is performing the action. Always specify the observer to maintain sentence clarity and avoid vagueness. Avoid sentences like: "Mistakes were watched by someone", and favour: "Mistakes were watched by a quality control team".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were watched by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received the action of being observed. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. Examples show it being used to describe observation by spectators, surveillance by authorities, or monitoring in scientific contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
68%
Science
12%
Encyclopedias
3%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were watched by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that indicates observation. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and shows a range of contexts, primarily within news and media, where it effectively conveys the act of being observed. While neutral in register, its usage can be tailored with more precise alternatives like "were observed by" for formal settings or "were under surveillance by" to emphasize covert observation. Remember to clearly identify the observer for clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were observed by
Replaces "watched" with "observed", suggesting a more formal or scientific observation.
were viewed by
Focuses on the act of seeing or looking at something.
were monitored by
Emphasizes continuous observation, often for a specific purpose like security or research.
were under surveillance by
Highlights the act of being secretly or closely observed, often due to suspicion.
had been watched by
Emphasizes that the watching occurred over a period of time before a specific point.
were overseen by
Suggests supervision or management, implying a level of responsibility.
were kept under observation by
More formal phrasing emphasizing the state of being observed.
were scrutinized by
Indicates careful and critical observation, often with the intent to find flaws.
were inspected by
Suggests a formal examination or evaluation.
were attended by
Implies observation within a group or gathering.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "were watched by" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "were observed by" or "were monitored by", which suggest a more detached and professional observation.
What is the difference between "were watched by" and "were overseen by"?
"Were watched by" generally implies observation, while "were overseen by" suggests supervision or management. The latter implies a level of responsibility and authority from the observer.
When should I use "were under surveillance by" instead of "were watched by"?
Use "were under surveillance by" when you want to emphasize that the observation is covert or involves a hidden monitoring effort, often due to suspicion or security concerns. "Were watched by" is a more general term.
Is it correct to use "were watched by" in academic writing?
Yes, "were watched by" is grammatically correct and can be used in academic writing. However, depending on the context, more precise or formal alternatives like "were observed by" or "were analyzed by" may be more appropriate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested