Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were watched by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were watched by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that someone or something was observed by another party in the past. Example: "The wildlife documentary revealed how the animals were watched by researchers for several months."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Jurors' rooms were watched by guards.

News & Media

The New York Times

We were watched by 4.4m.

News & Media

The Guardian

They were watched by surprisingly large and enthusiastic crowds.

Coldplay were watched by a better known rapper, however.

News & Media

Independent

In 2010, the debates were watched by 22 million people.

The television series made from his dozen Poldark historical novels were watched by 15 million people.

News & Media

The Guardian

The first videos appeared in 2010, and were watched by only a few hundred people.

News & Media

The Guardian

Whitehall sources do not deny that Libyan refugees and dissidents in Britain were watched by MI5.

News & Media

The Guardian

We slept on the bare floor and were watched by cameras.

News & Media

The Guardian

The finals last year were watched by an audience of more than 7,000.

All of them were watched by a vibrant cultural divide of a spectators' gallery.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were watched by", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what is doing the watching to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, "The experiment was watched by a team of scientists" is clearer than "The experiment was watched by someone."

Common error

A common mistake is using "were watched by" without a clear indication of who is performing the action. Always specify the observer to maintain sentence clarity and avoid vagueness. Avoid sentences like: "Mistakes were watched by someone", and favour: "Mistakes were watched by a quality control team".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were watched by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received the action of being observed. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness. Examples show it being used to describe observation by spectators, surveillance by authorities, or monitoring in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

12%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were watched by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that indicates observation. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and shows a range of contexts, primarily within news and media, where it effectively conveys the act of being observed. While neutral in register, its usage can be tailored with more precise alternatives like "were observed by" for formal settings or "were under surveillance by" to emphasize covert observation. Remember to clearly identify the observer for clarity.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "were watched by" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "were observed by" or "were monitored by", which suggest a more detached and professional observation.

What is the difference between "were watched by" and "were overseen by"?

"Were watched by" generally implies observation, while "were overseen by" suggests supervision or management. The latter implies a level of responsibility and authority from the observer.

When should I use "were under surveillance by" instead of "were watched by"?

Use "were under surveillance by" when you want to emphasize that the observation is covert or involves a hidden monitoring effort, often due to suspicion or security concerns. "Were watched by" is a more general term.

Is it correct to use "were watched by" in academic writing?

Yes, "were watched by" is grammatically correct and can be used in academic writing. However, depending on the context, more precise or formal alternatives like "were observed by" or "were analyzed by" may be more appropriate.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: