Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(30)
Morphological changes of monocytes from a healthy donor (control group) (Fig. 1(a)) were visually evaluated in response to their contact for 2 h with the pure ferrite nanoparticles (Fig. 1(b)) and with the bio-NCP (Fig. 1(c)) by means of SEM.
The locations of low uptake levels were visually evaluated both in IMZ SPECT and FMZ PET images.
All images were visually evaluated by three experienced nuclear medicine physicians with several years of experience in interpreting bone scans, and all evaluations were performed individually.
All PET datasets (PETDixon/CTderived/PseudoCT/BoneDixon and PETPETCT for each patient) were visually evaluated in random order by three readers who were experienced in FDG brain PET data analysis and blinded to the patient details and diagnosis.
The detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) of the quantified constituents were visually evaluated with a signal-to-noise ratio of about 3 1 and 10 1, respectively.
The adhesive properties of SPEV and HT29 cells were visually evaluated using an inverted microscope; the numbers of adhered and flattened cells were counted 30, 60, 120, 180, and 1440 min after culturing beginning.
Similar(30)
Simultaneously, clotting time was visually evaluated.
DNA quality was visually evaluated by comparing migration to high molecular weight markers.
Fruit decay was visually evaluated.
All these features can be visually evaluated on farm.
Finally, the specimens were dissected and the embedded reinforcing steel was visually evaluated for extent of corrosion.
More suggestions(15)
were visually scrutinized
were visually verified
were visually approximated
were visually assessed
were visually identified
were visually quantified
were visually investigated
were inadequately evaluated
were visually rated
were visually considered
were visually impaired
were visually scored
were visually disguised
were visually dissected
were visually characterized
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com