These parameters were utilized to evaluate the quality of the surgical outcome.
Risk analysis and Plackett Burman design were utilized to evaluate formulation variables in two paths.
MPA and well test are the basic facilities which were utilized to evaluate the characteristics and performances of unconventional reservoirs.
Cyclic voltammetry [CV] and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [EIS] were utilized to evaluate the electrochemical behaviors of the different composite electrodes.
Finally, the models were utilized to evaluate fracture toughness of the alumina film and DLC film in experiments.
Uniaxial stress-controlled tension tension fatigue testing (R = 0.1) were utilized to evaluate the fatigue behavior of the prepared nanocomposites.
Rutting resistance indicators, such as multiple flow number and loading sensitivity curve, were utilized to evaluate the rutting resistance.
Nanohardness and elastic modulus measured by nanoindentation at various treatment stages were utilized to evaluate the degree of recovery.
X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were utilized to evaluate different samples.
Results from each step were utilized to evaluate the change in pore-water pressure, stress, strain, displacement, deformation and water table of the slope with rainfall.
Non-optimized artificial centering hit-and-run (ACHR) method and metabolite flux-sum analysis were utilized to evaluate metabolic characteristics of strains.
