Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were three weeks ago

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were three weeks ago" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "was three weeks ago"? You can use it when referring to a specific event or situation that occurred three weeks prior to the current date. Example: "The meeting we had was three weeks ago, and I still remember the key points we discussed."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

There were 1,600 volunteers.

News & Media

The New York Times

"You were late yesterday.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Last year, there were 1,513 agreements.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

But last month was last month".

"Christmas is Christmas".

News & Media

The New York Times

"Set" is yesterday, "run" is tomorrow.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was early August, 1954.

News & Media

Forbes

That's 1975 billions!

News & Media

The New York Times

"Was yesterday," Porter said.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The wallpaper is 1940s.

News & Media

The New York Times

It certainly was today".

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure correct subject-verb agreement. If referring to a singular event, use "was three weeks ago". For plural subjects, consider rephrasing for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "were" with a singular subject. "Were" is typically used for plural subjects or in the subjunctive mood. Always check subject-verb agreement to maintain grammatical correctness.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were three weeks ago" functions incorrectly as a past tense verb phrase. It attempts to specify a time reference but fails due to subject-verb disagreement. Ludwig confirms it's not grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were three weeks ago" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig's analysis confirms this, indicating it doesn't adhere to standard English grammar rules due to subject-verb disagreement. To express a similar meaning, use ""was three weeks ago"" for singular subjects or rephrase the sentence for clarity. Given its incorrect usage and lack of presence in authoritative sources, it's best to avoid "were three weeks ago" in formal writing and speech.

FAQs

How do I correct the phrase "were three weeks ago"?

The correct phrase is "was three weeks ago" when referring to a singular event. For example, "The meeting "was three weeks ago"".

What are some alternatives to "were three weeks ago"?

You can use phrases like "happened three weeks ago", "occurred three weeks ago", or "three weeks prior" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "were three weeks ago" or "was three weeks ago"?

"Was three weeks ago" is correct when referring to a singular noun or event. "Were three weeks ago" is grammatically incorrect in standard English.

How can I rephrase "were three weeks ago" to sound more natural?

Instead of "were three weeks ago", consider saying "it happened three weeks ago" or "that was three weeks ago" for better clarity and grammatical accuracy.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: