Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
All identified studies were then reviewed by a second reviewer (ZF) and data extraction completed.
The included studies were then reviewed independently and scored by two reviewers.
Articles produced from this search were then reviewed for appropriateness.
SD-OCT scans from selected patient were then reviewed.
Selected articles were then reviewed in abstract form.
Genetic technologies in engineering exoelectrogens, in particular the genomic editing tools, were then reviewed.
The four syntheses were then reviewed and used to derive possible meta themes of therapeutic factors.
All gathered data were then reviewed and coded using the product-counterfeiting typology.
These were then reviewed against the eligibility criteria before inclusion in the review.
The individual fellowship websites were then reviewed for content and fellowship structure.
The free-text responses were then reviewed and grouped into three separate themes based on similarities.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com