Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were still to be

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were still to be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was expected or planned to happen in the future at a past time. Example: "The results of the experiment were still to be announced when the conference began."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Kinks were still to be worked out.

News & Media

The New York Times

Characterful houses were still to be had at modest prices.

News & Media

The Guardian

More than 40,000 votes were still to be tallied.

News & Media

The New York Times

Results from the Australian offer were still to be released.

News & Media

The New York Times

The main problems, of course, were still to be resolved.

A spokeswoman said precise details of the demonstration in the capital were still to be decided.

News & Media

The Guardian

In addition, lounge, brunch and tea menus were still to be completed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Yet Manser's most important public buildings were still to be realised.

But the best players here were still to be found in the back row.

Council roads officials said the details of access were still to be confirmed.

News & Media

The Guardian

Sleeping arrangements, at least for some, were still to be decided.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were still to be" to indicate an action or event that was planned or expected in the past but had not yet occurred at the time of reference. This construction is common in formal writing and news reporting.

Common error

Avoid using "were still to be" in contexts where a simple past tense or past perfect tense would be more appropriate. Overusing the construction can make your writing sound awkward or overly formal.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were still to be" functions as an auxiliary verb phrase to indicate a future action or state from a past perspective. As shown in Ludwig, it is often used to describe tasks, decisions, or events that had not yet occurred at a certain time but were anticipated.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Science

17%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

3%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were still to be" is a grammatically sound construction used to denote a future action or state viewed from a past timeframe. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage. It frequently appears in news and media, as well as scientific and encyclopedic contexts. While versatile, writers should ensure it aligns with the appropriate tense and context to avoid awkwardness. Alternatives such as "remained to be" or "had yet to be" can offer subtle variations in meaning. By understanding its function and nuances, you can effectively integrate "were still to be" into your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "were still to be" in a sentence?

Use "were still to be" to describe something that had not yet happened at a specific point in the past but was expected or planned. For example, "The final details "were still to be finalized" before the contract could be signed."

What are some alternatives to "were still to be"?

Alternatives include "remained to be", "had yet to be", or "were yet to be", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more correct to use "was still to be" or "were still to be"?

"Were still to be" is used with plural subjects, while "was still to be" is used with singular subjects. For example, "The details were still to be confirmed" (plural) versus "The plan was still to be approved" (singular).

What's the difference between "were still to be" and "were going to be"?

"Were still to be" indicates an expectation or plan that existed in the past but had not yet been realized. "Were going to be" also indicates a future action in the past, but it doesn't necessarily imply the same level of planning or expectation. For example, "The changes were still to be implemented" suggests a formal plan, while "The changes were going to be implemented" is a more general statement about a future action.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: