Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "were significantly low" is correct and usable in written English
You might use it to describe a decrease in a particular statistic, for example, "The sales numbers from last quarter were significantly lower than those from the previous quarter."
Exact(50)
Dissolved oxygen contents in water samples were significantly low at site S1 whereas optimum at rest of the sampling sites.
These current density values were significantly low as compared to the bare electrode (41.8 mA cm− 2).
Dissolved oxygen contents in water samples were significantly low at site S1 whereas higher oxygen level in water observed at rest of the sampling sites.
Feed intake, FCR, and survival rate of the fish exposed to treatments were significantly low when compared to the control fish group.
Corneal lesions of malnourished children admitted during the last 10 years were significantly low during infancy, particularly below 6 months of age.
Numerical results showed that SEA and peak force increased with increasing thickness of upper part and foam density while peak forces were significantly low in TWTs made from different materials.
Similar(10)
Further, results indicated that values in SRH at T2 were significantly lowest (=best SRH) in cluster 1.
At the same time, error rate was significantly low.
Further, the seedling vigour was also found to be significantly low in MAS and Tellahamsa.
The algal growth in the present study with ammonium nitrogen was significantly low.
The enrolment of the younger generation in vocational training is significantly low.
More suggestions(13)
were distinctly low
were significantly weak
were noticeably low
became significantly low
were substantially low
were dramatically low
becoming significantly low
were significantly lowest
were significantly smallest
were significantly lowered
considered significantly low
were significantly lower
become significantly low
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com