When the researchers dug deeper, they saw that the participants' unconscious instinct fared far better: in both studies, they were significantly faster at properly categorizing lie- and truth-related concepts when those concepts were presented with the lying or truthful face, respectively, from the video.
It was found that the number of teeth present, number of functional teeth, pairs of posterior teeth, HGS, BCMI, and BMI were significantly different between the groups, categorized according to palpation-assayed masseter muscle tension (Table 3).
However, UbcH10 positive cancer was more frequently and significantly categorized as a high-grade histological tumor [Grade 3; UbcH10 : 2.98%, UbcH10 : 17.91%] (p < 0.001; Fig 4A C).
Overall, the daytime ABP was significantly different among the patients categorized according to the H-grade using the JC, whereas the nighttime ABP was not.
Weight loss over the last 6 months was significantly more prevalent among those categorized as malnourished vs. normally nourished (15 vs. 3 patients; p<.0001), but was difficult to obtain or assess in 17 (30%) patients.
Our results show that (a) users' motivation for tagging varies not only across, but also within tagging systems, and that (b) tag agreement among users who are motivated by categorizing resources is significantly lower than among users who are motivated by describing resources.
As in previous work [20], participants' accuracy (A') in categorizing the faces was significantly better than the chance guessing rate of.50 [t(22) = 3.37, p = .003, r = .58] while measures of response bias (B') [45] showed that perceivers categorized more targets as non-Mormon than Mormon.
If subjects categorized along the dimension of tenure, categorization scores should be significantly greater than zero.
When the parts of mutants are categorized by degree of constraint, we find that weakly constrained parts are significantly more complex than more constrained parts.
AS patients showed significantly lower PF values compared with controls, and significantly more patients were categorized with restrictive pattern (18% vs. 0%, P < 0.001).
