Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(59)
Data were significant at p < 0.05.
Values were significant at P<.05.
Statistical differences were significant at the α = 0.05 level.
Yield differences between the treatments were significant at p < 0.05.
Their impacts were significant at θ25 kPa and θ50 kPa.
The constitutional changes were significant, at least on paper.
All results were significant at the 95% confidence interval (Supplementary Table 3).
Binomial enriched terms were significant at a false discovery rate of 0.05 by the hypergeometric test.
All other comparisons were significant at P<0.001 two tailed (Fig. 3a).
These effects were significant at s.c. doses of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg (Figure 2).
Similar(1)
(No correlations were significant at α = 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com