Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were shared with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were shared with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate the transfer of something from one person to another. For example: The cookies were shared with everyone at the party.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
They were shared with HMRC in 2010.
News & Media
Sometimes those were shared with colleagues.
News & Media
Musole's findings were shared with various Zambian government ministries.
News & Media
Summaries were shared with The New York Times by people in attendance at both.
News & Media
Concerns over the weather and the price of tickets were shared with the 2012 Games.
News & Media
The revised figures were shared with the Food and Drug Administration, Lilly said.
News & Media
Hospitals whose GPS details were shared with the authorities were regularly shelled by government forces.
News & Media
These views were shared with respondents in many other northern cities, including Leeds and Liverpool.
News & Media
Mr. Bush also gave his approval, though what details were shared with him is not known.
News & Media
Images of the pair were shared with the account's 95,500 followers.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
On average, sexts were shared with more than three friends.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were shared with", ensure that the subject clearly indicates what was being shared and with whom. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "were shared with" when an active voice construction is more direct and concise. For example, instead of "The information were shared with the team", consider "The manager shared the information with the team."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were shared with" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject received something from an actor. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a grammatically sound construction. Examples show it used to describe information, resources, or even burdens being distributed among individuals or groups.
Frequent in
News & Media
55%
Science
40%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "were shared with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to indicate that something has been distributed or made accessible to others. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. As demonstrated by the numerous examples, it appears most frequently in news and scientific contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what was shared and with whom. While the passive voice construction is correct, consider whether the active voice would be more direct. Alternatives such as "were distributed among" or "were communicated to" may be more appropriate depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were distributed among
This alternative highlights the act of dividing something and giving portions to multiple recipients.
were communicated to
This focuses on the act of conveying information through various means.
were circulated to
This emphasizes the act of passing information or documents around to a group.
were made available to
This highlights the act of enabling access to something.
were disseminated to
This suggests a more formal or widespread distribution of information.
were disclosed to
This emphasizes the act of revealing information that was previously hidden.
were provided to
This focuses on the act of supplying or furnishing something to someone.
were imparted to
This emphasizes the act of conveying knowledge or wisdom.
were given to
This is a more direct and general way of saying something was handed over.
were entrusted to
This suggests a sense of responsibility and confidence in the recipient.
FAQs
How can I use "were shared with" in a sentence?
The phrase "were shared with" indicates that something was given to or made accessible to someone else. For example, "The research findings were shared with the scientific community."
What are some alternatives to "were shared with"?
You can use alternatives like "were distributed among", "were circulated to", or "were communicated to" depending on the context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were shared with"?
While "were shared with" is grammatically correct in the passive voice, consider whether using the active voice would make your sentence more direct. For example, "The company shared the report with investors" (active) versus "The report were shared with investors" (passive).
What's the difference between "were shared with" and "were provided to"?
"Were shared with" implies a reciprocal or communal aspect of giving, while "were provided to" simply indicates that something was given or supplied. For example, "Ideas were shared with the team" suggests a collaborative exchange, while "Resources were provided to the team" indicates a supply of necessities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested