Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Seventy individuals were selected for comparison of dry weights (5-7 individuals × 4 demes × 3 selected days).
The remaining 110 patients were intubated without a trial of NIPPV and were selected for comparison.
The three flows, consisted of various constitute particles, were selected for comparison.
Five principal lifter features including working height, length, width, payload and price were selected for comparison.
Of the >250 entries from the database, 132 data sets from 18 different studies were selected for comparison.
As a result, four out of all 14 default EF impact categories were selected for comparison to the material footprint.
Three LULC types, namely, Eucalyptus woodlot, cultivated land and grassland in each study catchment were selected for comparison as treatments.
The three land use/land cover types in each study catchment were selected for comparison as treatments.
The studied method is a non-chemical route to produce the particles, and chemical synthesis routes were selected for comparison.
On the basis of these results, ET-G and ET-Plus were selected for comparison in a RCT.
Thirty-one genes representing 10 gene families were selected for comparison and complete genomic and cDNA sequences were elucidated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com