Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In addition to electronic databases, the reference lists of the included studies were searched, relevant conference proceedings and key journals were hand searched, and a thorough grey literature search was conducted.
Similar(59)
We tested a crucial implication of this hypothesis in experiment 4. In experiments 1 3, WM contents were search relevant.
PubMed, the National Guideline Clearing House, Google, Google Scholar and relevant college websites were searched for relevant guidelines.
Different databases were searched for relevant articles.
Nineteen electronic databases were searched for relevant literature.
PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies.
Databases were searched for relevant articles and articles selected independently by two authors.
Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Lilacs were searched for relevant studies published up to May 2016.
Proceedings from seven HIV/AIDS-related conferences were searched for relevant abstracts.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies published up to April 2011.
PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Scopus were searched for relevant articles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com