Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were sacked

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were sacked" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe someone who has been dismissed from their job or position, often in a sudden or informal manner. Example: "After the poor performance of the team, several players were sacked by the coach."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Unpopular governors were sacked.

News & Media

The New York Times

Some reckless executives were sacked.

News & Media

The Economist

Whistleblowers were sacked or sidelined.

News & Media

The Guardian

Some regional bosses and officials were sacked.

News & Media

The Economist

Quarterbacks were sacked just five times.

When cities were sacked, they were looted.

(New Orleans quarterbacks were sacked 41 times).

The towns and villages were sacked.

Gen Ahmed and Gen Usmani were sacked.

News & Media

The Guardian

They were sacked twice, for 6 yards.

Two social workers dealing with her case were sacked.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were sacked", ensure the context clearly indicates dismissal from a job or position. Avoid using it in contexts where 'sacked' could be misinterpreted, such as referring to physical sacks.

Common error

Avoid using "were sacked" when a more neutral term like "were laid off" is more appropriate, especially when the job loss is due to economic reasons and not performance issues.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were sacked" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject of the sentence received the action of being dismissed. Ludwig provides many examples showing how it is used to describe job loss.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Science

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were sacked" is a passive construction used to describe the act of someone being dismissed or fired from a job or position. As indicated by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and very common, appearing frequently in news and media contexts. While more formal alternatives like "were dismissed" or "were terminated" exist, "were sacked" provides a straightforward way to convey job loss. When using this phrase, ensure the context clarifies the meaning and avoid misinterpretations, as Ludwig AI says it is usable in written English.

FAQs

What does "were sacked" mean?

"Were sacked" means that someone has been dismissed or fired from their job or position, often abruptly or informally.

What can I say instead of "were sacked"?

You can use alternatives like "were fired", "were dismissed", or "were terminated", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is "were sacked" formal or informal?

"Were sacked" is considered relatively informal. More formal alternatives include "were dismissed" or "were terminated".

When is it appropriate to use "were sacked"?

It is appropriate to use "were sacked" when describing someone being fired or dismissed from a job in a straightforward, often slightly informal, manner. Avoid using it in highly formal or sensitive contexts where a more neutral term would be preferred.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: