Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
There were no revisions for stem loosening but 2 stems were revised for fracture — both with a defective cement mantle proximally.
A total of 704 joint arthroplasties (419 THA, 285 TKA) underwent revision surgery for aseptic reasons, while 299 arthroplasties were revised for deep infection (132 THA, 168 TKA).
During follow-up 13 revisions were performed; in 3 cases a two-stage total revision was performed for septic loosening and 9 cups were revised for aseptic loosening.
There were 106 joints in the study of which 54 were revised for aseptic loosening and 52 were assigned to the control revision group.
Our final cohort consisted of 683 uninfected arthroplasties (401 THA, 282 TKA) that were revised for mechanical failure, and 321 (150 THA, 171 TKA) infected joints that underwent revision for PPI.
Officials figures also were revised for March.
Two HG cups were revised for augmented polyethylene wear.
No stems were revised for aseptic loosening or osteolysis.
No acetabular components were revised for polyethylene wear or dissociation, acetabular osteolysis, or loosening.
No acetabular components were revised for polyethylene wear or dissociation, acetabular osteolysis, loosening, or deep infection.
Three of the 120 HG I acetabular components were revised for wear and osteolysis without loosening.
More suggestions(17)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com