Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The three systematic reviews, categorised as Level 5, recognised that the current standard of literature on which their reviews were based did not meet the high standards of formal academic rigour with little published or unpublished literature on the specific area they were reviewing in relation to IHPs.
Similar(59)
These were reviewed in Ref. [11.1].
The data were reviewed in the American College of Physicians-American Society of IntereportediciNo Health Insuranceh INo Health Insurance
The remaining 1020 manuscripts were reviewed in their entirety.
Perioperative outcomes were reviewed in 316 patients undergoing primary TJA.
Angiograms were reviewed in all cases to assess lesion characteristics.
Please note -- these books were reviewed in 2014.
Pathology reports were reviewed in all cases.
Patients' records were reviewed in detail.
Eleven manuscripts were reviewed in full.
Discordant cases were reviewed in more detail.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com