Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Article titles were screened for eligibility by two reviewers, and abstracts or full texts were reviewed as necessary.
CT reports obtained from eight databases were reviewed, as well as public free-access electronic databases for CT registration.
Current 13C-metabolic flux analysis methods were reviewed as well as the weakness of the conventional metabolic flux analysis without 13C-labeled experiments.
Some policy documents were reviewed as well for the study.
All clinical encounters that occurred after the index visit were reviewed as well.
Also, besides examining the technological gap, the technical efficiency and the technology gap ratio of manufacturing units in consideration of the size of manufacturing unit were reviewed as well.
Finally, the references of all included articles were reviewed as well.
The titles and abstracts of the remaining 388 publications were reviewed as well as publication type.
Toxicologic investigations were reviewed as well; no indications for chronic toxicity were found [ 12, 33].
Results of laboratory investigations viz: blood culture, full blood count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were reviewed as well.
Hospital admission, discharge, and progress notes, as well as consultation reports, laboratory tests and imaging studies were reviewed as needed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com