Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Reponses with values for gender that were missing (n = 17) or "other" (n = 2) were excluded from analysis involving those variables, as were responses from mixed competitions (n = 77) that made analyses by competition type difficult to interpret.
The biggest surprise after going public, he said, were responses from people who had said some of the most homophobic things in his presence.
After data cleaning, there were responses from 368 persons.
Most valuation tasks were carried out in one sitting: in only 13 (2.3%) were responses from a set received on more than one day.
There were responses from 15 occupational therapists, 5 nurses, 5 speech-language pathologists, 4 athletic trainers, 4 physical therapist assistants, 4 social workers, and 2 medical doctors.
Just under half of the responses came from institutions with fewer than 100 beds, but there were responses from a number of medium-sized and larger hospitals as well.
Similar(52)
What we really want to see now is responses from different branches of science.
The first sources are responses from those whose work Finkelstein has discussed.
But what's been the response from many men?
What's been the response from the Hollywood community?
These were typical responses from highly educated, fluent English speakers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com