Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were reached out to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "were reached out to" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "were reached out to" should be replaced with a more appropriate expression. Example: "The team members were reached out to for their feedback on the project."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
were approached by
have been instructed
were notified
were surveyed
were engaged
have been contained
heard from
have been confronted
communicate with
were consulted
had correspondence with
have been communicated
have been impacted
have been contacted
have been negotiated
received communication from
have been caught
were reached by
have been connected
have been notified
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
During the baseline survey, 275 healthcare workers (HCW) included doctors, nurses, paramedics and sanitary workers, and after 3 months of intervention, 255 were reached out to complete the questionnaire.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
They were reaching out to shake his hand, to touch him.
News & Media
Republicans responded that they would win seats because they were reaching out to independent voters.
News & Media
Within minutes, Facebook engineers were reaching out to Khalil.
News & Media
They were reaching out to the communities to uplift them.
News & Media
He's reached out to a lot of people.
News & Media
ASofor the rest, who cares?" Signowp for the besheof VICE, delivered to your inbox daily.
News & Media
We should be reaching out to them".
News & Media
Finally, you're reaching out to people's pain".
News & Media
Japanese companies are reaching out to the world.
News & Media
"Everybody is reaching out to private donors now," she said.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "were reached out to" in formal writing. Opt for more grammatically sound alternatives such as "were contacted" or "were approached" to maintain clarity and professionalism.
Common error
Many writers mistakenly use informal phrasal verbs like "reach out to" in contexts that require a more formal tone. Ensure your language aligns with the intended audience and purpose by choosing more precise and professional vocabulary.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were reached out to" functions as a passive construction, where the action of contacting is directed towards the subject. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is not considered grammatically correct in standard English.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "were reached out to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and is rarely used in formal writing. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is advisable to replace it with clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "were contacted" or "were approached". Although examples can be found in news and media sources, the limited usage suggests that it's best to avoid this phrase in professional contexts. Opting for alternatives will improve the clarity and professionalism of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were contacted
This alternative replaces the informal "reached out to" with a more direct and professional term, focusing on the act of communication.
were approached
This suggests a more formal interaction, implying that someone initiated a conversation or made a request.
were communicated with
This emphasizes the two-way nature of communication and suggests an exchange of information.
were got in touch with
This is a more informal alternative that still maintains grammatical correctness, suitable for less formal contexts.
were consulted
This implies that someone sought advice or input from the individuals in question.
were engaged
This suggests an active involvement or participation in a discussion or activity.
were canvassed
This refers to soliciting opinions or support, often in a systematic way.
were solicited
This indicates a formal request for something, such as information or assistance.
were asked
This is a simple and direct way of saying that someone made a request or inquiry.
were surveyed
Implies that data or feedback was gathered through a formal survey process.
FAQs
What is a better way to say "were reached out to"?
Instead of "were reached out to", consider using stronger alternatives like "were contacted" or "were approached" for clearer communication.
Is "were reached out to" grammatically correct?
No, "were reached out to" is not considered grammatically correct in formal English. It's better to use "were contacted" or "were approached" instead.
When is it appropriate to use "reach out to"?
While "reach out to" is common in informal contexts, it's often best to use more formal alternatives like "contact" or "communicate with" in professional or academic writing.
What's the difference between "were reached out to" and "were contacted"?
"Were reached out to" is an informal and somewhat awkward phrasing. "Were contacted" is a more direct, grammatically correct, and widely accepted alternative suitable for most situations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested