Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Video segments were rated by three judges.
Additionally, the CAD templates were rated by three anaplastologists.
Subjective effects were rated by psychometric rating scales.
In the end, the teams' decisions were rated by their peers and by independent judges.
The Bulls were rated by some the worst team in Division I-A.
Their answers were rated by several teams, including the soon-to-be groom's friends and parents.
Movements were rated by two reviewers based on the 9 operational definitions of the SFPC.
Oral analgesics and most nonpharmacologic pain relief methods were rated by caregivers as only partly effective.
The resulting 15 male faces were rated by 60 females on various attributes.
Study design and statistics were rated by using an established rating system.
Symptoms were rated by means of the SANS, BPRS and Abrams and Taylor rating scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com