Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The CEPET/CT and UEPET/CT data were randomly interpreted 4 weeks apart by a senior researcher with 4 years of experience in SA-PET/CT and 7 years of experience in SA-PET and a junior researcher.
Similar(59)
All included studies were randomly mixed and interpreted by independent readout of two orthopaedic surgeons (K.W. and S.R). with 5 to 6 years of training in orthopaedic and particularly shoulder surgery.
However, it should be remembered that neither hospital staff nor hospitals were randomly selected, and thus hospital mean scores should be interpreted cautiously.
The 'Gold Standard' was randomly generated and interpreted as a logic Boolean model to simulate perturbation experiments using CellNOptR.
Patients were randomly selected.
Instead, rewards were randomly distributed.
Households were randomly selected within PSUs.
Face classes were randomly intermixed during acquisition.
Within these regions, sites were randomly selected.
Samples were randomly chosen from the populations.
The interaction terms are randomly chosen from a uniform distribution and may be interpreted as edge weights or probabilities of the edge existence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com